Where such students continue to make unsatisfactory progress, the Academic Registrar will refer the students to the relevant dean for final determination.ДҐ.7. The Academic Registrar may divert a student within 25 points of completion of their course from a CAPC hearing where the student has been identified as having made unsatisfactory progress for the first time. A dean may review the outcome of the unsatisfactory progress identification process prior to students being notified of their academic progress status and may manually revert a studentвЂ™s academic status where the studentвЂ™s individual circumstances warrant such action.ДҐ.6. Interviews with student advisers and meetings of the course academic progress committees (CAPC)В and Academic Board appeal hearings must, as far as possible, take place between teaching periods to ensure that matters are resolved prior to the commencement of the next progress review period.ДҐ.5. Proactive intervention strategies during the teaching period and before the final summative assessment date must be put in place for students whose academic performance puts them at risk of failing a subject or not achieving an honours grade (for honours students).ДҐ.4. The dean will monitor the academic progress of bachelor honours students and students enrolled in the courses listed at section 7 of this policy through formative assessment tasks throughout the teaching period. In particular students who have a repeated pattern of withdrawn subjects may be required to attend a meeting with a student advisor or asked to attend, and/or make a submission to, a Course Academic Progress Committee (CAPC), to assist completion within the maximum time to complete.ДҐ.3.

The Academic RegistrarВ or a dean may review a students' academic progress at any time throughout the year for the purposes of monitoring or implementing intervention strategies. The Academic Registrar will review studentsвЂ™ academic progress following ratification (finalisation)В of results at the end of each progress review period.ДҐ.2. (b) warning the student in writing that continued unsatisfactory progress may lead to termination of their enrolment in the course.ДҐ.1. (a) offering the student support and advice giving the student an opportunity to meet the expected standard and Deans responsible for the courses listed at section 7 of this policy must put in place an вЂњat riskвЂќ process for students who are at risk of failing any subject which includes: (g) fails to meet a course progression requirement in the timeline approved by the Board.Д¤.5. (f) is a student in a bachelor honours program and fails to achieve an honours grade and/or course weighted average where it is a requirement of the honours program (e) is a graduate student in a course listed in section 7 of this policy and fails any subject in the progress review period or has an 'вЂat riskвЂ™' status and fails a compulsory or core subject has an вЂвЂat riskвЂ™вЂ™ status and withdraws from a core or compulsory subject previously failed or has an вЂњat riskвЂќ status and fails a particular elective subject for a second time or fails a particular elective subject for a third time or fails 50% or more of credit points attempted in the two previous progress review periods (d) is enrolled in an undergraduate course or graduate course other than those courses listed in section 7 of this policy and: (c) withdraws after the census date or after the last date to withdraw without incurring a fail grade from all enrolled subjects in the progress review period for the second time or, (b) fails to meet a condition which has been imposed as part of an earlier academic progress review process (a) reaches the maximum time to complete a course without completing the requirements of that course A studentвЂ™s progress is unsatisfactory if the student:

Unimelb subject reviews